Not bad, but cost savings?

Not bad, but cost savings?

SodaStream Soda Cool (with 1 x CO2 cylinders 60L and 2 x 1L PET bottles), gray (household goods)

Customer Review

I bought the mega-set because it was on sale just to test it once :-)

In Mega Pack includes:
The instrument itself,
2 x 1 liter bottle,
2 x 0.5 liter bottle
and of course the CO2 cylinder and a 6-pack with syrup samples for the price of 49.99.

The build quality is quite good, the use of the CO2 cylinder, no problem, just a bit annoying the lower floor
has no attachment of, but you can also omit the ....

The insertion of the bottle must be something to practice because you indeed needed both hands, but then folds after some time.

For effervescence itself: In order to obtain a reasonably useful result I must at least 6x top press,
even then it's still a far cry from the usual mineral water! Help us doing something if the bottle after the
Adding CO2 from something leaves the bottle in the device.

Should refrain you but to give them the syrup into the bottle as this is probably faster then unansehbar
and in addition it often needs to be cleaned! Better give syrup and water in a glass and mix there.

For price / quality ratio: Spare do you look at in my opinion only hauling bottles!

One liter of mineral water costs us the equivalent of almost 17 cents per liter and bring back I need this
not sparkling and it is all!

The syrup of Sodastream produced for much plastic waste and it is favorable not exactly, because to get to
additional costs of around 40 cents per liter! Not just a little in my opinion.

Better alternative is fruit juices in the 1.5 liter bottles which just so and the costs at least 2.80
Same :-)

CONCLUSION: enthusiasm comes with me not quite as on the taste is far from the preferred by me
Mineral water and a corresponding saving is not in sight. There remains only the environmental aspect left ....

Desk Calendar Rank: 5/5
February 24
Shirt with neon colors Rank: 5/5
October 3
Quality and full Rank: 5/5
March 28
Disappointed 1523 Rank: 2/5
May 26

Related Reviews


Not bad, but for what?Logitech UE Boombox (Bluetooth) (Electronics) Not bad, but at best, only the average score, on the edge of irrelevance, hardly any variation, almost no innovationBeatsteaks (Audio CD) Not bad, but not me skin aroundCardboard (Audio CD) not bad, but 13Harry Potter - Nimbus 2000 (Toys) Not bad, but mainly because the set is so low priced34tlg. Inside and outside Torx socket wrench bits nuts Torx sockets (Misc.) It's not bad but not the best F1 game I've ever seen!F1 2014 - [Xbox 360] (Video Game) Well not bad but worthy of improvement !!Rosco Strobist Collection for Flashes Korrektu (Electronics) Not bad, but still great for MFTWalimex lens pouch NEO 300 S Model 2011 (accessory) not bad but ... the keyboardC660-1DK Toshiba Satellite Laptop 15.6 "Intel Core i3-380M 640GB RAM 4096 MB Windows 7 ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470 White Texture (Personal Computers) not bad but no pigmentationw7 In The Nude Makeup Palette Eyeshadow 12 Effect Nude Star 141 g (Health and Beauty) not bad but 22 1Clash of Lords 2 (App) not bad but I expected betterONKYO LS-T10 MP3 & Dock Iphone Black (Electronics) Not bad, but ... 35 1Dirt Devil M2992-2 Centrino CleanControl Bagless Cyclonic Bag Black / Red 1.5 L (Kitchen) Not bad but a bit soft VersionRhymes & Games /Vol.4 Fingers (CD) Not bad but ... 48Nike + Kinect Training (Video Game) Not bad but too big for iPhone 5sWantalis SmartWatch wrist Smartphone Case Black (Sports) Not bad but ... 60Samsung EFC-1M7FYEC Flip Leather Case for Samsung Galaxy S3 Mini Yellow (Accessory) Not bad, but not great 6Watch Dogs (Video Game) not bad but ..... 75Foxnovo 3-in-1 Universal Folding PU Flip Case Stand Kit caches for 7 Inch Tablet PC (Purple) (Electronics)