- The usual small sensor,
- A itzeligen cheap lens with a small, dark ie, aperture of hefty 1 / 6.9 at telephoto position (the previous models had become even 1 / 5.9, so that's already small lens again smaller and therefore cheaper) .
- Plastic lenses,
- Without mechanical image stabilization,
- Without iris (instead with a cheap, switchable filter)
- Without supplied (USB) cable,
- Without the supplied memory,
- Without supplied bag,
- Without instructions supplied neither on paper nor on CD.
What do you expect from such a camera? The pictures are especially in the telephoto range fuzzier than those of more expensive cameras, and too little light and no flash is because of the cheap lens and small sensor "to pick up" not much, ie the images are fuzzy or noise.
With enough light or flash the images are useful, and given the small price you can not really complain too. Who wants to have a better device, must stop spending more money; for the other buyers - or purchase ends - or rather, bought-do - or better yet, buy-wishers, purchase ends and buy-to-do - which is now at last politically correct?!? - It may be a smart, space-saving and useful camera.
