This book is guaranteed 100% missed (and deceptively simple but pretentious to 200%). I even wondered if cétait well Michel Lorgeril who washed writing because I'm used to much more of her! Javais started by writing a critic who wanted succinct but even there would be so much to say that it would take tens of pages: is it worth the effort in the game? So, here are some examples (among others): 1 - the best diet in the world has never existed, and never nexistera nexiste not, nor the Mediterranean quaucun other. If we do not understand why it is better not claim to be an expert in nutrition! 2 - the Mediterranean diet is much better without any difficulty that CL regime based charcutailles and Beaujolais pots, or that the American system based on industrial ignominy of all kinds, but presents so many disadvantages that it is better emergency forget it (just as most miraculous diets but cans quon trying to peddle); 3 - this way of eating is today completely obsolete and does not meet at all or to the existing constraints, nor the recent discoveries; 4 - nest it in no way a solution for the future or the world's populations, nor for that of the planet: Michel de Lorgeril visibly knows nothing of anything or economics or ecology; 5 - with regard to science and medicine, they committed such mistakes (and numerous!), Taking as many compelling speeches and the hands as crooked characters (eg cholesterol: thank you Michel to wash Lorgeril proven!), that it is better to be cautious and discreet. This is the essential part in essentials. For the rest, Michel de Lorgeril starts by learning nutrition of the future and not the past before launching into writing a book already obsolete even before to have been started. As, in addition, this book is overpriced (shame on the editor!), Buy it really is to throw his money away
