It should have a speed of 245/190 MB / s, which will not be reached on my notebook.
Here the relevant key data of my system. These readers may perhaps close my review on what can be expected for speeds on your system.
Notebook: Acer Aspire 5755G
CPU: Intel Core i5-2450M 2.5 GHz
RAM: 8 GB DDR3
SSD: Samsung 840, 250 GB
USB 3.0 Controller: NEC / Renesas 720200A (latest driver: 2.1.39.0)
Although my notebook is very fast in all respects, the older (but very common) Renesas controllers seem to be the bottleneck. Namely I reach only values of 170/100 MB / s.
Whoever takes only due to the higher speed for 64 GB version, can save the money. The measured values are of me namely to reach the 32 GB version of the stick (245/100).
The one star devaluation I have to give unfortunately due to the lack of housing. This unspeakable sliding mechanism should be finally abolished on USB sticks. Sooner or later, the mechanism is worn out and you always have to leave the plug in the thumb on the slide, which is not always possible for reasons of space.
Also should be a taboo to wide USB devices. I have broader USB sticks experienced (but also USB modems etc), but also the Sandisk Extreme is a bit too wide. With a computer, I could connect the VGA cable only with great difficulty.
Despite the extended slide which is held by the thumb, allows the USB connector half a centimeter pure free and push out. He seems to be internally mounted only very loosely.
A Connecting to a USB port is thus limited. For a better understanding I have them created and uploaded a short video.
I second the mass so on: The speed and the price / performance ratio are beyond reproach, devaluation there but due to design errors beginners by Sandisk.
***
Here's a tip: To ensure that the information on the underside of the USB stick does not peel off after about half a year (depending on usage), it should be about sticking a piece of transparent tape. The imprint includes the serial number of the USB stick without a warranty processing is impossible.
