rigorous and relentless investigation necessary !!!

I am an agronomist working in cooperation on agricultural development in Southern countries. All those who, having some biological and agronomic culture, following the issue of GMOs have long known the ravages of excess pesticides and huge species contamination problems (cultivated and sometimes wild) related to GMOs. They know the resistance issues, know the danger of genetic uniformity, and varieties adapted to diverse ecosystems can be developed on site. They know for 7 or 8 years that the herbicide resistance gene introduced into rapeseed pass in wild crucifers and genetic contamination is proven long, they know (Articles World 2003) that GMOs houses prepare turf Golf herbicide resistant and it is monstrous (imagine how it does not pass into the wrong herbs neighbors ... who are the same species!); they know the damage caused in India and Paraguay. On these aspects, the survey of Marie Monique Robin does not bring anything new, but it explained very well to a wider audience, which is essential.
Where the contribution is even more essential is the implacable demonstration of mechanisms to impose GMOs, proven scientific fraud, the manipulation of information. The shell game on the qualification of GMOs as unmodified plants, reports FAO based on an unfounded US decision and serve to affirm source from "independent" reliable GMO is particularly well analyzed.
This book should be read by all those who question honestly on the subject. As for you who demolish this book, it is your absolute right. But please, take your criticism about the rigor of the demonstration, the quality of sources demonstrating the scientific fraud, potential bias. But do not just ideological and pithy comments ("she made her investigation at the computer", "everyone knows that GMOs are effective in poor countries") that do not measure up to the demonstration, and so similar to pseudo arguments of authority developed by Monsanto and promoters (blind?) biotechnology ...