But this time everything was different. The team chose the warming technique gives away the corner. Granted, cold coffee tastes lousy, old as well. So why not always freshly brewed and equal portioned right? In addition, the flavor can be selected individually. This is also a great advantage.
We opted for the available within the Vine program Senseo. That we would have acted so even without Vine. The "canned solution" we do not find so appealing. In addition, the Philips machine has a good reputation when it comes to longevity. That too was a einfließender consideration in decision-making. We were curious.
When unpacking gabs no surprise. The Philips Nose still looms ahead and is processed properly. Haptic Philips is at the height. Anyone who has ever seen a Senseo will be found in the "new" quickly master. The water tank is removable as usual. The controls are limited to three buttons. The operation is very easy. The important thing is to close properly again after you insert the pad, the upper part of the machine. The result is accustomed gutschmeckend. This is due to the choice of pads and their quality. That there are major differences here has meanwhile spread.
The wide range of pad-party was to take the Senseo us another criterion. Here you'll find something suitable for almost every taste. The cleaning of the machine can be mastered quickly. The removable tank is well cleaned soon as the canopy. Conveniently remains a Senseo still not. Who wants to have good coffee has to pay him. That's also when the Senseo way.
Short and sweet
Positive:
+ Optics / processing
+ Überschauhbare, robust technology
+ Ease of use / cleaning
+ Wide range of pads available
+ Potable result
Nerve factor
- Waste producer
- Price-Performance
My conclusion: The Senseo convinced us with the easy handling and the wide range of usable pads in many different flavors. A bargain is not by the higher follow-up costs but.
