This unit has now has a more modern SmartTV, which is also extensive with respect to the Apps.
Important to me was the presence of the Amazon Instant app which runs quite fast on this BD player.
The dimensions and the design are very similar to the Samsung BD-C6900 old.
The analog outputs for stereo audio and video have been removed, and result in a BD player does not necessarily make sense.
The 7.1 outputs are still present, but the decoding of an AV receiver is usually better than that of a BD player.
Update:
The image quality is very good, being in here high quality televisions are already necessary in order to notice a difference can.
In my Philips TV 9000 series is determine to my old BD-C6900 is no difference, however, was also the player of the 250 class, and not necessarily the worst player.
For normal movies at larger viewing distance is virtually impossible to establish something in the image quality, otherwise it looks for high-quality documentaries from BBC, here you could say the high-quality components come into play if necessary.
However, it is very likely the influence of the TVs on the quality substantially greater than that of a Blu-ray player.
Sound Technically, the Player condemned only for pure reading of the data, because when connected via HDMI and / or S / PDIF.
So quality influencing zero (even if you might call jitter as keyword).
The internal decoder, I also connected and tested, makes subjective its thing not really good, something is lacking dynamics and resolution.
But it's like I said known which can significantly better decode a good receiver here the data, so clearly is the core competence of a surround receiver. ;)
[.....]