sony. make believe!

The Sony RX100 has surprised me very positively. Certain "Jammer estates" of other users for example. via small buttons,
smooth housing etc. are not unjustified. But in my opinion, makes this camera "smaller" external imperfections
with convincing intrinsic values ​​/ results more than offset. Knackscharf, natural color reproduction, and at ISO800 still very minimal noise in the full view. However, the pictures with the basic settings to appear colorful and high contrast. Fortunately, makes the menu quite simple to readjust. What makes the feel d. + Narrow smooth casing itself into the rubber handle AG-R1 (extra accessory) significantly improved (yes, it's not cheap, but also does not cost the world). Those who have already used Sony NEX or SLT, should get along well with the menu and the buttons, and then knows how to appreciate all the comfortable setting.
Ultimately, the decisive - the image results - for me are much better or more appealing than that of a DSLR with Kitlinse. Even the enormous quality, bright Zeiss lens can already convince at open aperture usually. In conjunction with the Deutl. larger sensor can create wonderful images, regardless of the lighting situation. Yes, this camera is designed to make photos, which of course requires a certain amount of practice and skill. This does not mean that even the auto mode can bring great results (use this not). Thus, the acquisition of the RX100 makes most sense of all that (at least partially) to use their vast possibilities. And no half-hearted, but a real alternative to "big" search. And do not forget - it's also the typical Sony quality video function on board. Therefore, the first appearing rather high purchase price is not really high. Who emphasis on folding screen and (according to tests) still little finer image quality, can access the same for RX100II or soon coming III. The RX100III then has 1 good opt. Viewfinder (extendable) on board and is priced of course first really high ...