Sound budgetary helper with aspects for improvement

At Christmas I had tired of the mud and the dirt of 4 dogs from one corner to the other to wipe and ordered the Thomas Pet and Family ... in the hope that we had found a good solution to the constant problem.

I have "my Thomas", as I call him, so far only used as a vacuum washer.
What it can:
It can fairly straightforward and after some practice quite rapidly wipe and suck at the same time.
Since I have two young dogs, the 100% were not yet housebroken the time of purchase, Thomas has quite often can eliminate small "accidents" without a trace.
The bed has 2 x basic cleaning behind him - with good results and also the carpet was already enjoying the fruits of a cleaning. That was very convincing indeed.
The cleaning of the container is a bit annoying but all in all it's fast and is only slightly more complex than the washing of Mopaufsätze and cleaning the mop bucket. But fresh is clearly separated from dirty water and you wipe the dirt does not always back and forth.
For the wash eyes it takes some practice but if you get the hang of it goes quickly and easily.

What he can not:
At 4 Irish wolfhounds plenty of hair fall in the apartment.
With the long hair of Waschsauger essay comes only partially cope and they remain in the brush stuck and clog sooner or later the suction slot, which then reduces the washing performance.
So I have to actually sweep or vacuum to achieve an optimum result before washing eyes. Here I feel at least no workload.
The corners you have to if you want it, continue to wipe. I have to any other wiper system as well.
The essay has clearly limits his. Under furniture or under the sofa you can not get it.

Thomas delivers a solid result. A star deduction there to get along for the Herauspuhlen the dog hair from the Wischsaugaufsatz and the inability of the animal hair.
My Dyson Animal Vacuum Cleaner Pro is clearly better under the bed and in the corners and definitely has much less problems with the vast amounts of dog hair long, but it can not wipe.
The second point deduction is available for the cleaning of the collecting vessel, as it is a bit more complex, not necessarily so much that that would stop me from a return purchase, but to really get this good clean saut you every now and then a bit in the pan around and you should dry the items afterwards and this needs a bit of space, due to the quantity of items.
Also the storage of Thomas is not optimal at rest. Since I as mentioned, use it only to wash eyes, I let the essay like it and so everything is a bit bulky.

Would I buy it again? Probably.
The system is definitely promising, but there is still room for improvement!