I read with pleasure the previous book of Laurent Obertone, I so eager to read Utoya. Knowing that he would disturb gauchards making only strengthen its appeal for me. Consisting of 3 separate parts (the assault on the island, thought Breivik and preparation of the attack) it is confusing in its construction, as was the "Orange France Mechanics". The author deliberately breaks the timeline of the event, and the action begins from the first page. It reads very quickly, and it is believed that the book quickly to was written by Breivik himself. The passage to the novel actually totally transforms the understanding of this event. It does not analyze the subject from a distance, protected and distanced by morality, but from the inside, by the thought of the killer that has its own logic. This vision, no one had actually offered to the public until now. The bombing of a sudden finds a logical, meaningful, thanks to the "wrong" killer narration. In this indirect way, I thought that was put on trial in Norway lax, live-set-and utopian. Norway is described as a deep extremist countries in its inoffensive air. The low, gender theory, the single thought and self-hate rage. So, lextrémisme Breivik responded to the voluntary suicide of Norway. Breivik is not a madman, and when you think in many ways it resembles the direct action of French terrorists who believed (believe?) To change the face of the world by a solitary and decisive action. Most of them were released on parole. Not sure that the same indulgence is accorded to him ...