The "experts" are wrong, is a great phone!

I then still considered what I need:

1 / Large display which is readable even in sunlight.
2 / music player with excellent sound.
3 / No curious OS with apps uncertain and unclear update (Android).
4 / SD slot.
5 / Good camera.
6 / Good quality (ie no plastic Samsung or HTC).
7 / Scratch resistant glass.
8 / Easy backup, and never a cloud (data protection, who knows ...).
9 / payable (ie not iPhone)

Since then was not much. Android is too open and uncertain, including Windows backs up only through the cloud, the Lumias have no SD courts etc. etc.

And then came the phone. No sign of "bad" smooth the opposite! The update of Anna Belle ran to jerk-twitch, then there was the free MS Mobile Office suite on top and good's it.

The build quality is really great, the design is great and the sound is knotless, even with the supplied handset. With a Sony handset the 80 class is new soundscapes to do ...

Little points of criticism:

- RAM bit too tight.
- Camera button rather fiddly by the elegant sloped panel backwards.
- Battery permanently installed.
- Browser is used to, then have the same Opera draufgesetzt and well-being of Use.

So what's all this bleating of "Cell Tester" and "experts" (see, inter alia, Focus Online, as it is only at number 50 of the ranking list)? For me, the meaning of free Gemeckere Android and Apple impaired testers who might still claim that on Nokia unfortunately is no Apple logo.

I would buy this phone again and again, especially at the price of 240th

I see the forced marriage of Nokia with Microsoft skeptical when the Lumias on are as bad as before.