So why pay more?
Well, if you consider to never have to laboriously rid the basin of stubble ... so a well worth it ever was. If the razor fulfill this wish also, so everything would be well palletised and the more than 40 + well spent. Forget it. Whether the razor now a "beard-aspiration rate" of more than 80%, has: it land still hairs in the sink. The must be removed. Whether it is 100% or 20% are honest: does that for you when you remove the hair a difference? Not for me. To sum it up: I was disappointed by this in itself very practical function.
Well, there is still the manufacturing quality ... if true, then so much money for a beard hair trimmer but okay !? A pious wish followed by a sadly mundane answer: No way! Also, if several times described here: The flap, under which the "beard chamber" is, undoubtedly has a predetermined breaking >> parking Eich had the razor so a total of 3 times to complain (!). One has to be said appreciatively: PHILIPS has a great customer service. All well and good, only helps nothing: breaking point is and remains predetermined breaking point.
The bottom line is sobering. Scratching head, I wonder: Why I had again spent over 40 than necessary? This question remains PHILIPS me and surely many other customers owe ...
