Lolita is a cultural and stylistic monster serving a perversion Nabokov manages to sanctify pure aesthetic enjoyment, free from any legal, moral which for him has no place in art. Everything is fluid, perfect, colorful, flowing, wonderful as a heinous long dream. A book to cause syncope among moralists so. Basically, it's a rather simple story psychologically: a fine, cultured and hypernévrosé of old Europe arrives in the New World in the knowledge that he has completely messed sexual adolescence passing by the stroke his life. The result: as a current Bambi after his stolen youth, Humbert Humbert will continue to run after the nymphet. Following is an almost logical asymptote gradually evolving into madness and blood.
As reported several times - and it is reassuring - who think Lolita is a polemical book understood nothing. As Genet, such as Sade and others in Nabokov art transcends morality. His "Lolita" did not kill anyone and was probably caused any evil or any pedophile in the world, which exist very well on their own, without literature (sometimes with the Church). By cons, "Lolita" has enchanted and still delight avid readers of genius and great literature.
Cher (e) Amazon (do), you know what you have to do.
