There are now many who speak of Rezesionen eg MW 2.5. Personally, I can not quite understand the negative opinions. If you have dealt with the new Call of Duty Part anything before the release, you got actually exactly the image of the game as it now actually looks like. Why should we restructure a gameplay completely when it comes down to the players and runs without any problems? The image has not really improved, but the game runs well on older computers. But one must also say that the graphics are by no means outdated MW3. The comparison between Battlefield 3 and Call of Duty MW 3 I find just plain wrong. In my opinion, these are two completely verschiendene game principle. I own both games and each of them has its own appeal for me. With 16 new multiplayer maps and a new single-player, I find completely exaggerated to refer to it as the game add-on. Add-ons are for me such as extensions of "The Sims". There are also new weapons and game modes.
Finally, it is for me to say that MW3 met my expectations and I will have fun with the 16 multiplayer maps for a long time.
