what motivates you, sir, when you write this book?

But should we therefore agree with the logic of the author and its findings? In what does it fit?

I think a book published by Plon, this is not a book published by L'Harmattan. And a book published by Editions Godefroy de Bouillon like this, this is NOT AT ALL anecdotal.

So it seems appropriate that the readers, before igniting putting this book 5 stars, as if France was violated by the invader and drag in the mud, go for a walk on the site of Editions Godefroy Bouillon and look a bit that publishes the publishing house: anti books Islam, Christianity pro for the Pétain réhabiliation, the Crusades, the Christian identity, etc. Y sees it one nuanced book about Islam or Christianity not oriented pro book? No. Y sees it only one book on the evolution of society? No. Nothing in the shade, nothing in the measure that bias and an inscription "Christian France and many Christian".

We also learn on the internet that the author directs the observatory of Islamization (you must visit the web is sooooo informative) intervenes to other sites directed all very well (just type the author name in Google to see what he says and where it operates).

So a book on the excesses of Islam, ok yes it is needed is vital. But a book that smells bias 10 km and is published by such publishing house, and as an author, not.

After that, it is for everyone to see how he reads a book: we simply raw facts or we are interested in how the facts are referred to some conclusions at the expense of others? Moderate Muslims ultimately exist in this little book. Muslims are dangerous. No shade, everyone in the same basket since Islam is well done. It seems to me reductive and deeply wrong. And no further analysis is taken into account.

Islam, immigration, identity, France are complex and serious subjects. We will prefer books Bruckner (Tyranny of penance, the sob of the white man) or Malika Sorel. Anti white racism will be read, we read the books of Malek Chebel, and we'll see if we can summarize the problem as how to cut by putting people in the same bag.