At this window sucker me the fact attracted no more dirty water from dripping onto the windowsill or delicate floors, as this is immediately sucked.
The practical test was unfortunately rather disappointing, because, unfortunately, the teats compared to my conventional puller but quite a few disadvantages:
* The windows need to be cleaned with extremely much water, otherwise the rubber lip of the sucker can not good enough to suck on the disc, and unsightly streaks and stains appear on the discs (with a conventional puller you come out with a lot less water because the water is not sucked yes immediately, but can be painted from top to bottom on the quasi disc)
* The pace is much slower compared to my conventional puller, otherwise you also get spots or streaks
* The bottom of the window can be combined with the "bulky" suckers do not reach properly, so you have to wipe with a cloth
* The rubber lip (clearly a wear part) can not be replaced, so you would have to buy a complete new suction
SUPPLEMENTARY May 2015. There are now the rubber lip to buy as a replacement part Leifheit 51160 Set rubber lips window sucker, the manufacturer has responded well
* The battery is the manufacturer after every use to be recharged, the tank must be cleaned, and this will cost in addition to pure window cleaning time
Conclusion:
I take my conventional squeegees this device clearly before, since I clearly saving on labor, and achieve better results.
Who it is very important that no water drips, and who is willing to invest money and time, which is well served with this electric window sucker.
