Amazingly small and well

Actually, I come from the full-pixel-peeper Group, but for some time I have a take-along a μFT system (Panasonic GF1). For shenanigans a few adapters for M42 and another and a Sigma-fixed focal length.
At the GF1 missed the focus peaking and the fact that the sensor is stabilized - just for the use of old manual lenses.
After all the stories of Paddy in Podcast and also the good opinions of others professional photographers on the OM-D series, I had taken the e-M10 targeted, alternatively, the E-M5. The last price cut during the presentation of the E-M5 Mk II seduced me into buying the E-M10, and I have to say I am thrilled.
The service is a bit strange almost divine intuitive for Canon users, but compared to a A7R that I could hold in my hand already, for photographic purposes. If you put the required functions to the many configurable buttons, you can take pictures very well with the camera. The folding screen opens up new possibilities in combination with the compact dimensions.
When it comes to the display (and also the electronic viewfinder), this I feel compared to a DSLR than quite well, the power consumption in compliance with still limited. A spare battery is still mandatory, a photographic holiday likely a alone can not lift.
The camera fits snugly in the hand and makes both a Industar pancake lens (whose slender character of bulky adapters somewhat spoils) and with a massive telephoto Tair a good figure.
Well, I think that the resolution "only" 16 MP is and thus the pixel density is not excessively large. A small drawback is the fact that ISO is 100 emulates only the software side, but the image quality is very neat even at ISO 200 in 100% view.
All in all a round value package for photographers. Videographers will probably be happier with other cameras.