F0,95 for full-frame

F0,95 for full-frame

Zhongyi Mitakon Speedmaster 50mm lens f / 0.95 for Sony E bayonet eg A7 A7S A7R incl. Sunshade (Electronics)

Customer Review

The lens has come on the market recently. What distinguishes it is that it is suitable as opposed by now several other putative light monster for full frame. Creamy, it is still, of course, advantages and disadvantages at the same time.

Why one buys such a lens? There are several reasons, one is the bokeh. With such an open aperture of the background is very blurred. Especially lights in the background can make very nice on the screen.

Then the light intensity, but since you should have no illusions. 0.95 previously reported As with my review of the SLR Magic Hyper Prime for E-mount APS-C, F0,95 is more psychology than that it works wonders. This I had already found with the Sony 50mm F1.8 compared (SEL50F18) and that there is little difference in light intensity. For Sony's 50mm knackscharf also at maximum aperture.

Here I have a comparison with the Sony A-mount 50mm F1.4 made that I operate with the adapter LE EA4 at the Alpha 7, the swallows also again light. Yet even here the difference is not necessarily serious. It's not like that a bit light intensity will decide whether you can take a picture or not. It has just a little more ISO noise when a level goes up and more it is not.

A test image showed 1/13 s when Mitakon and 1/10 s at Sony, another image provides 1/1250 s to 1/800 s, ie between no worlds. Where can I find the bokeh at Mitakon even creamier because edges are better. In the center I can not "is the sharpness of the Hammer" find (Quote Product Video), will be somewhat blurred (see comparison image). Also the contrast I find offenblendig very weak. On the Alpha 7R I would not even see it. Dimmed at F4 sharpness is then good, it does not need the lens.

Then we are back in focus manually, as opposed to the compared Sony. Action photography is so naturally excluded. The enclosed cat image is the sharpest of 71 shots. When walking around almost no chance was to focus, because the focal plane is so narrow. The Sony goes very quickly, autofocus and make the image directly. Even subject tracking with the phase focus is possible. Stabilizer have not both.

The Mitakon is significantly heavier and larger than the Sony adapter. The size is still ok, comparable to the Sony Zeiss 24-70mm F4. With its 0.8 kg you can not just take it once in a while with the bag.

My conclusion: The high price can be found in more weight than in the power again. With the adapted SAL50F14 you go cheaper, has autofocus, aperture control and EXIF ​​data.

Addendum 13.03.2015: Several reasons no longer leave me at peace, drawn up for the nearly 1,000-euro-a lens 5 Star Rating. I want to make comprehensible.

1. The lens flange is loose. I've noticed that the lens when focusing more and more shaky. At first I suspected the bayonet, upon closer Examine I noticed that the rear metal ring is anchored to the depth of field scale fixed to the bayonet, while the rest of the front lens wobbles. By wiggling during manual focus well Loosened screws inside. Whether that was smart, I do not know, I unscrewed and found that three mikrige screws must hold almost 1 kg lens the bayonet ring. By tightening this screw is tight. For a lens in this price range is an absurdity.

2. The lens hood is of brittle plastic. When I once encountered while, the fixing bayonet is immediately erupted. Since the panel was now already broken anyway, I've got something down on it. Lo and behold, immediately crack the plastic. The separately enclosed in cheap, neutral point cardboard sun visor is fragile goods, so no modern, tough plastic, as one should expect in this price range.

3. Weight and image quality does not match the price league in which the lens is sold. Why are lenses from Sony, Zeiss Sigma or easier? Because they use, instead of the heavy lead glass, high refractive index glass. The known glasses, surcharge's thinner glasses. Compared one gets from the Sigma A-Mount 105mm F2.8 macro that still delivers smoother bokeh, autofocus and stabilizer has, for about 400 EUR. Or the aforementioned Sony A-mount 50mm F1.4. Just to talk about the price range, the Sigma 150-500 mm super telephoto zoom. That's a whole different league of lenses, since nothing breaks, because does not solve anything, because there are no vague figure.

I hope this was somewhat understandable. If there is evidence to my review, you are allowed to write to the comments like this, so what I learn it and the people in the future to get better reviews. Otherwise also like to "like" button.

Best value for money 6 Rank: 5/5
January 19
Still the best lens cap Rank: 5/5
February 10
A nice device. Rank: 2/5
November 6
Correct 1 January 14 52 Rank: 3/5
April 8
Functional and good quality Rank: 4/5
January 23

Related Reviews


Very good lens for full frameSony E-mount 28-70mm F3.5-5.6 lens black (Accessories) Great & affordable "Always top" for full-frame!Canon EF 28-135mm / 3.5-5.6 / IS USM lens (72mm filter thread, image stabilized) (Camera) Convincing Canon wide-angle zoom for full frameCanon 16-35mm 1: 4 L IS USM EF Lens (Electronics) Probably the best and most practical wide-angle zoom for full frame NikonNikon AF-S Nikkor 16-35mm 1: 4G ED VR lens (77mm filter thread, forming rod.) (Electronics) absolute class, not for full-frameTokina AF 11-16mm / 2.8 lens for DX Canon (Accessories) Fisheye for full-frameWalimex Pro 12mm f / 2.8 Fisheye Lens for Canon EOS DSLR bayonet black (Accessories) Super wide angle for full-frameCanon EF 28mm f 2.8 IS USM Wide Angle EF lenses (58mm filter thread) black (Camera) Tip, but not for full-frame.Tokina 50-135 / 2.8 AT-X 535 PRO DX lens (optional) Portraits for full frame a real dream opticsSony SAL-85F14Z 1.4 / 85mm Carl Zeiss lens (72mm filter thread) (Accessories) For full frame camera too smallEVOC camera compartment for Backpacks Camera Cb block, black, 12307-101 (equipment) full frame and good quality for little moneyCanon EOS 6D full-frame digital SLR camera with Wi-Fi and GPS (20.2 megapixels, 7.6 cm (3 inch) screen, DIGIC 5+) only housing (electronics) useful equalized 12mm on full frameSigma 12-24 mm II DG HSM Lens F4,5-5,6 (82 mm filter thread) for Canon lens mount (Electronics) Full frame lens of the upper class !!! I am completely thrilled !!!Walimex Pro 12mm f / 2.8 Fisheye Lens for Canon EOS DSLR bayonet black (Accessories) Photosensitive full frame camera is fun - but not necessarily for everyone the right choiceSony Alpha 7s digital camera (12.2 megapixels, 7.6 cm (3 inch) LCD display, Full HD, Uncompressed output via HDMI (4K / Full HD) Silent Shooting mode, dust and splash proof) (Electronics) Fine Tuned full frame DSLR for serious amateursNikon D610 SLR Digital Camera (24.3 megapixels, 8.1 cm (3.2 inch) display, Full HD, AF system with 39 focus points) body only (Electronics) Works for me (wearing glasses) good with the DX camera, but not with the full-frame cameraNikon DK-17M magnifying eyepiece for D1 / D2H (s) / D2X (s) (Camera) Class for getting into full frame - Tips for the time afterCanon EOS 5D Digital SLR Camera (12 Megapixel) camera housing (electronics) Price-performance ratio very good. Fits for Sony full-frame.Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro Lens (62mm filter thread) for Sony lens mount (Electronics) A ready to hand full frame combination for many situations - Tamron 28-300 with Canon 6dTamron 28-300mm F / 3.5-6.3 Di VC PZD lens for Canon Bayonet (A010E) (Accessories)