Fast, cheap, easily: Recommended!

Have for my Intel BB NUC5i5RYH Rock Canyon High i5 Desktop PC (Intel Core i5 5250U, 2.7GHz, no operating system) new memory needed because in this computer only DDR3L modules can be used with 1.35V. So it was not possible to existing SO-DIMMs that operate with minimal 1.5V to continue using.
After looking in terms of price-performance and current needs, I decided for Crucial CT51264BF160B. On that occasion, two modules were equally appointed to take advantage of the dual-channel mode of NUC boards can. It was only in dual-channel mode, the full capacity of the memory itself, as well as the integrated Intel HD 6000 graphics, the need to have recourse in the shared memory method on the memory that can be accessed. The performance difference between single and dual-channel operation, depending on the scenario, in about 30%.
Have both modules directly subjected to a memory test that both modules have passed without objection. This is especially important when. Before Linux has to be used as the operating system, since RAM errors are not quite so simple forgiven, as under Windows Also easily passed a stress test with Prime95, in which I have utilized the full 8GB of RAM.
From the performance point it may not be the fastest modules, the charge for something faster alternative with 1866 Mhz was me personally but currently steep. The timing was right correctly recognized by the Board (CL11).

The total storage capacity amounts to SiSoft Sandra 13.54 GB / s in Windows 8.1.
When Windows 7 Experience Index, a value of 7.5 is achieved.
Geekbench 3.0 32bit (2 x 4 GB) Memory test: 2037 points (single), 2547 points (Multi)
Geekbench 3.0 32bit (1 x 4 GB) Memory test: 1849 points (single), 1880 points (Multi)
Unigine Valley Basic settings: 10.7 fps (1 x 4 GB), 14 fps (2 x 4 GB)

Conclusion
Crucial CT51264BF160B with 4 GB work perfectly with me and deliver a decent performance. The value for money (26 Euro the time of purchase on Amazon) I find currently class. Recommended!