Super image quality, but slow to AF and often inaccurate

Super image quality, but slow to AF and often inaccurate

Tamron AF 70-200mm 2.8 Di Macro SP digital lens (77mm filter thread) NEW with "Built-in Motor" for Nikon (Accessories)

Customer Review

I bought the lens, although the opinions go here and elsewhere apart. One says, has no problems with the lens, others complain about the slow and unusable autofocus.

So I want now after three months of experience with this lens sometimes add my two cents.

I wished a Telobjektiv for my Nikon D5000 and decided consciously against another plastic lens (55-200 or 70-300), but I was afraid to buy another lens to interact with the performance I am not satisfied at the end , Previously I had a 18-55 VR, a 18-105 VR and a 35 mm Nikon. Except for the fixed focal length but I was eigtl. Not really really happy with the imaging performance of the lenses. So over here had a lens from a higher league. The Nikon 70-200 2.8 I could not afford it, the Sigma 70-200 2.8 I did not want.

The first Tamron 70-200 2.8 that I had made great pictures right away. Contrary to many statements, the AF would be inaccurate and too slow, which was not an issue in my case. The images were super sharp and the speed of the AF's handed me only once, because I did not want to use it for sport photography.

In the first long-term use, however, I had the first problem. The lens ever adopted by my camera. It entered the error message "no lens". The lens had the bayonet too big a game and therefore lost between every now and again the contact with the camera. After turn off then on the camera, the problem was solved. Only it was troublesome in the long run. Every few minutes, pull off this procedure, so I decided to call and check with Tamron. There you share with me, I will send in the lens. The problem was where probably already too well known, so it seemed to me on the phone over, anyway. Even I could find on the Internet the same problem with other people. Now I did not want to wait 6-8 weeks until the lens repaired from the service comes back. After all, one might also use his new toy yes and not give away the same first for an eternity again. So I swapped a lens from the merchants and took another new with. 50 km round trip, 50 KM back.
It should turn out later, they were not really new two lenses that I bought there. Probably both were already used exchanged for the same reason, and again their original packaging returned for sale. Thank you Media Markt.

The second object was then so far with my camera along, as it is no longer approved. The lens sat bombproof on the housing. I was happy, at least until I then looked at the images on the Screen.

A Disaster! Almost all the images were blurred, never has the AF sat where it should. The focus point was always in another place, as I had given him. After a moment's thought, I also brought this lens back and let refund me my money. 50 km round trip, 50 KM back. When I came into the media market, I saw my back given Tamron again in the showcase are exhibited. The next customer will be pleased. Even my second vice exchanged objective is likely to be gone back on sale again. That's eigtl. Outrageous, I have the seller's problems but described exactly and made clear to him that both lenses unusable.

Anyway, I now had my money back, but also no more telephoto. I was first served. Until then two weeks later I happened to Saturn in the showcase was my Tamron again. I told the seller there from my suffering, an exchange would also there is no problem if the lens again ready problems.
I have tried the lens in the shop on site, but what can be assessed under these lighting conditions and on a Mini DisplayPort already?

What can I say? All good things come in threes! The third Tamron works finally reliable.
The images are a few exceptions (slight camera shake because no VR) super, just like I have dreamed.
The only drawback: As described, the AF is really somewhat slower than I was used to with my Nikon lenses it. Fast action, galloping children or even in animals, moving toward the photographer of AF is usually not. Here you simply have too much waste.

Since I photograph mostly in zoos, where most of the animals rather move "controlled" but that is no problem. The vast majority of shots are really very good.

I highly recommend this lens caused because I now times simply go out of it, which are still more lenses in circulation, could make the problems than the two that I had. It may also, of course, that these problems occur only in interaction with my camera model, possibly running my back given lens on a Nikon other without any problems?

Anyway. If you have found one that suits, you will be rewarded with good shots. I want it now anyway no longer give it back. with the aforementioned weaknesses I have arranged me an expensive Nikon 70-200 is for me not in question, I do not too expensive.

2.5 stars due to defects Rank: 3/5
August 12
happy mistake in my order Rank: 5/5
January 21
recommended 55 2 Rank: 5/5
July 19
1 bel purchase Rank: 4/5
February 15
Cheap and not good 1 Rank: 1/5
January 4

Related Reviews


Receiver with good image quality but very poor service and long starting timePace TDS865NSDX HDTV Twin satellite receiver for Sky HD (Electronics) Super image quality, but not adhesive enough for our wallsWall Decal Jungle Forest lion and giraffe, squirrels owl on colorful tree wall sticker for kids Kindergarten bedroom Super image quality and good grip in low light but difficult to use for an amateur ...Canon Powershot SX260 HS Digital Camera 12.1 Mpix Grey (Camera Photos) Super image quality, true full-frame and low.Canon EOS 5D Digital SLR Camera (12 Megapixel) camera housing (electronics) A noble and versatile high-end compact camera with excellent image quality - but too big and too heavy in the PowerShot family?Canon PowerShot G1X Mark II Digital Camera (12.8 megapixels, 5x optical zoom, 1: 2-3.9, 24-mm wide angle, Full HD CMOS sensor) (Electronics) Super image quality defects but problematicX100T Fujifilm Digital Camera Compact Pro Wifi fixed 35mm F2 lens, 16 megapixel X-Trans II (APS-C) Hybrid Viewfinder (OVF and EVF) with Electronic Rangefinder AF phase detection, Silver (Electronics) Super image quality and a clear buy recommendation!GoPro Action Camera + Hero3 Black Edition Outdoor (EU Version) (Electronics) High-quality image quality but simple-minded and weak motivesPhoto Objects 50.000 Volume II (CD-ROM) Enormous settings, good image quality but moderate macro modeNikon Coolpix P510 Digital Camera (16 Megapixel, 42x opt. Zoom, 7.5 cm (3 inch screen), GPS, image stabilized) (Electronics) Great image quality, but unusable when the sunSony DSC-TX100VS Digital Camera (16 Megapixel, 4x opt. Zoom, Full HD Video, GPS, 8.9 cm (3.5 inch) display, image stabilized) Silver (Electronics) Super image quality, service improvementSony HDR-AS15 Action Cam Camcorder with backlight (Exmor R CMOS sensor, Full HD, WiFi, microSD / SDHC card slot, microUSB) (Electronics) Interesting concept, top image quality; but only suitable as a second or third cameraSony DSC-QX100 Smart shot Digital Camera (20.2 megapixel Exmor R CMOS sensor, 3.6x opt. Zoom, 28mm Carl Zeiss Vario Sonnar T lens with F1.8, HD video recording) black (accessories) Super image quality - better for me than Sigma!Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm 1: 1.8 g ED Lens (Electronics) Super image quality. Price-performance ratio!Samsung UE32H5070 80.3 cm (32 inch) LED backlight TVs (Full HD, 100Hz CMR, DVB-T / C / S2, CI +) (Electronics) Top image quality, but cut back in the B-NoteLG 42LF5610 106 cm (42 inch) LED backlight TV (Full HD, DVB-T / C, CI +) White (Electronics) Brilliant image quality, problems with the durability and quality controlCanon EF-S 17-55mm 1: 2.8 IS USM lens (77mm filter thread, image stabilized) (Accessories) good image quality, but extremely "American" motivesHEMERA Photo Objects 50,000 Vol. 3 (CD-ROM) Great instant camera, beautiful image quality, but sometimes tricky handlingFujifilm Instax Mini 7S 15834705 EX WT instant camera (62 x 46mm) (Electronics)