I bought this book in English by Amazon "Muhammad: His Life Based on the Earliest Sources" since this book was written in English and it is also cheaper (16) that the French language version. This book is well written but it's the fairy tale version of the Prophet's life. He is depicted as everything nice, perfect, copy, and especially not debatable or questionable (on pain of death). How can we consider it a biography "valid" that is based on the writings dating back 200 years after the death of an individual? This becomes the clothing fancy structured to serve a supremacist ideology of conquest. It states that the ummah needed to believe his naive and illiterate faithful.
