A disastrous state of mind, a false thesis from the start

The thesis of this book is false from the beginning. How can one equate, in today's society, three fundamentalisms so different? Can we just use the same term to refer to fundamentalism (a) among Christians, majority population and historical religion of our countries, a marginal movement increasingly disavowed the centuries by history, (b) among the Jews, which account for only 1% of the French population and 0.3% of the world population, and still less if there are only religious, a very minority tendency within a religion that is absolutely not proselyte, and finally (c) among Muslims, a coordinated international movement, strong logistic support from several governments aiming a planetary conquest? This is simply absurd. Since when the "Jewish Fundamentalism" threat he secularism? How can he be a threat? The very idea of ​​this book, as the title reveals, stems from an attitude and a very politically correct speech and dear to many of our political leaders, who are to pose as equivalent which is not and back to back all the parties, and thus the aggressors and their victims, especially not to displease the first of which was fear. The real culprits of the most disturbing abuses we want to spare because we dare not fight them. Or one household for other reasons ... and sometimes shameful, however avowed! See in this regard the recent position of Caroline Fourest in the case of "Cottage des Vosges".