A little hygiene

Agree or not with E Todd (ET), the good health of the famous "freedom" of opinion and expression of a country is also able to accept the arguments that will contradict the consensus. Difficult, indeed, to have more consensus that "I'm Charlie" since the Liberation funérails or Victor Hugo. So that someone who says m ****, without lapsing into extremism. That's a brave too, precisely because it opposes the consensus. As such, this book, read at the same time as that of Fourest Carolina, is a perfect counterpoint. Where Caroline Fourest boasted to open doors open, let himself be carried away by his emotions (and its sad passions to become hateful), boasted to criticize those who are already stigmatized the central media company (Le Pen, Soral , etc.), and offers a reading that he wants to factual (even sil says dexaspération write in a state) and without trying to please.

The speech DET, in outline, was relayed by the media. Charlie, this is a post-Catholic block (Zombies Catholics, bringing in their wake the middle class) who do not believe in legality, the same as in Catholicism there is a hierarchy of beings, and wish to recreate a group "responsible". From where the appearance of a true excluding lislam in this procession (I nemploie not too overused the term Islamophobia Islamophobia to design literally means "fear of lIslam" and some of our fellow citizens can have "fear" not "exclude". A fear can meet the light, to the exclusion, I do not know).

Obviously, Det reading allows us to expose us to a more detailed analysis as described by the media or Mr Valls, and for a very methodical work that navigates between lessai and the research paper. Strong themes, actually abandoned my opinion, are addressed. One of legality, that of the social situation (nen offense to C Fourest or BHL) of Muslims in France, the processing lantisémitisme three years after the attacks of Mehra, the scope of religious acts January (acts of madmen or "true servants of God"?), the support by the state of a anarchist and sacred act of a perhaps not so religious that it versus drawings that are not universal and nengagent their authors, etc. etc.

The purpose, again, is not for me to say who is right or not. I do not read books to be okay with them, but to confront me with ideas that make me grow, to talk about our day to build my own point of view. Det book allows the conversation, not the Fourest, which explains the difference in rating between. That is why the book deserves Det quon devotes time.

It is obvious, however, that January 11 is too close, the thought DET is not completely free of shortcuts that are there to serve his purpose. But having already taken so decline in three months, that's an accomplishment to be welcomed.