To my disappointment, I did not like this book. I can even (rare) fell from the hands repeatedly. I had great difficulty in overcoming ...
I had the feeling that Mr Hefez clings to a single hypothesis is the following (excerpt from his book P195)
"The safest way men have found to render their subjection to the belly of women bearable, and to maintain control over their offspring, is to subject them to their turn to submit, by reversing the balance of power and organizing their own domination over women.
This was done, and even very well done, down to the smallest details: on gender, our whole structure of thought based on the difference between women and men, and on the prioritization of this difference in favor of men. For millennia, the bodies and minds are molded, formatted, scheduled around this truth: man is powerful, the woman is low. The man enters the woman is penetrated, so the man is active, passive woman. The man is the woman undergoes. The man controls the woman faints. The man thought the woman senses. Man seeks autonomy, the woman enters into a relationship. The man takes the woman (is) deal. Man needs to be useful, the woman to be loved ... "
This hypothesis is interesting, but I think she has developed during these 230 pages. 230 pages with the same idea, it is long !! Repeating and repeating the same thing over and over again with different phrases.
The style is more or less the same: a repetition of short sentences (in which the antithesis is used excessively as in the previous excerpt) and short questions (page 136: "What woman am I in front of this man I just met? What man am I in front of my mother? What woman am I in front of my daughter? What man am I in front of my boss? What woman am I face my fantasies? What home am I face my desires? What father do I deal with my children? ... ") in the middle of a text which (I repeat myself) always says the same thing.
Many things ultimately did not mean much. This book could have 50 pages instead of 230, a short essay that could be very interesting. But I guess it would have sold cheaper ...
In short, you'll understand that I have not found this interesting book, although I fully share his views.
The issuance of Public Service on this subject, to which he also participated, more than enough on the subject to know his views and arguments (which are still interesting).
