It is simply outrageous that the "value" to "stars" of the book is significantly lowered by a "critical" totally absurd as that of "Roman"; pinailleur famous as noted, almost verbatim, the misprints and / or translator! The author is not responsible for this and the ridiculous criticism belittles the work of the author. Those who seek an opinion on the "BACK" of the book do not know more so with this silly criticism because it deals with the form: at the risk of repeating myself, ask the Amazon readers an opinion on what you liked or disliked in the work of the author and nothing else (form => faults of "hits" missing points ending sentences ... ??), this is not the only example alas comments I have identified fault because that is not based on what the author wanted to convey as a message. Please, do not ridiculous interventions which lower the overall estimate of works that do not deserve such "sanctions". What a shame to waste his time and that of potential readers by providing a "review" over form wacky !!! RickN.
