H16 is not a professional journalist, is above all an exceptional blogger. I read articles on the net since his debut in 2005. After tasting his prose, I assure you that you'll struggle to get back to one or other of the "references" of the French press. The completed daily reading, we better understand the gnashing of teeth of a justly maligned profession, and will increasingly manifest regulate internet (the comparison is too harsh). This kind of maverick talent is a rare jewel, but a jewel to be enjoyed before it was one of those mornings buried by any law we invented to "protect". In summary, H16 is a precise and rigorous analyst distinctly liberal (with a few pieces of anarchism in). His style skillfully combines rigorous arguments, explicit and sourced to traits of fierce and exhilarating humours. Obviously, one might think that only the Liberals show whether laudatory. I think this is the yardstick that recognizes the best: even his opponents recognized him these qualities, while expressing their disagreement over substance. Will he best indicator?
