But f / 2.8 IS is also bulky, heavy, and thus not practical in any situation. And when we look more closely, objectively, the images it produces are not better than fixed focal lengths like 135mm, 85mm or his counterpart f / 4 IS (aperture, depth of field and therefore put aside from). So we end up with a target whose defects can overlook its undeniable in many optical qualities situations. Wedding reportage for example, it becomes a ball that is woefully lagging (although it never leaves me anyway). Getting the best is not here synonymous with mobility and ergonomics.
This F2.8L 70-200 IS still a goal in almost perfect from the subjective, I just could live without!
