Approximate printer If something has to happen quickly.

Was curious how the results look.
So unpacked, loading paper, inserted ribbon, turned reingeschoben SD card, make settings, and selected images already went out of print. It's that simple.

The printouts are of acceptable quality. Of course Subject of output format.
With an Ixus 95 the colors are very cool, with a EOS 60D everything is super. So do not ever complain only about the printer, but also times check the camera.

The built-in display is a bit blurry. To check which image is sharp, it is not fit that you should do on the camera. With Canon cameras and other compatible devices, you can also directly control the printer without PC. Then you can make all settings in the camera and generate a print job. Properly with the Ixus 95 for example.

The printing costs remain within the limits. Approximately 0.29 per image sounds only times a lot, but keep in mind that they do not use ink that dries, no print head is cleaned after each image, the service life during non-use is of no interest, the paper is in a cartridge in which one is safe can store in a dark environment, the printer can be transported in any position, it's running out of nothing, he is really tiny and white and super chic.

The print media are designed so that the color of the number of sheets reaches exactly there are no individual colors changed but always the complete thermal transfer ribbon, so you can until the last image print and do not buy more until the color because of the Printer left the service because of an empty paint that is perhaps not even needed for this.

In comparison, I can only the Epson R800 specify a top unit makes great prints up to A4, but there the printing costs with little printers are much higher. With this device, the print head cleaning uses more ink as the printouts themselves.

In a nutshell ... For an image that you urgently needed and only in geinger amount the ideal device.