After I've done the monitor in detail to heart and used some test programs, I have to clearly advise against a purchase. As soon as you turn on first a few drops to. The brightness distribution is so bad that you think you have here a 0815 Budget Monitor. In the two lower corners of the lighting extends into the center of the screen and destroy the supposed positive point of this monitor, the IPS panel. This allows for stability of the contrast even from larger angles, which also fully apply here. Since I had just stand next to an Asus with TN panel, which should actually be replaced with this one, but I fell right to the next. The display is not suitable for office, because it seems a slightly pixilated or blurry immediately. Since all settings did not help! Why this is remains unclear, possibly. Because of the 3D technology or indeed because of the IPS? The display itself is light reflective, but this never disturbing. As I said, reading of texts is compared to my TN highly stressful. The 3D conversion is pure gimmick and conveyed little deep impressions. For this you need to be then resort to Tridef software or for free iZ3D. This I did not test it because it had no relevance to me. The conversion was also heavily blickwinkelabhänig and reducing the resolution was striking, but acceptable. In terms of response time, the monitor has rarely problems. All I could even realize a very noticeable input lag. More I do not want to write, the disappointment of Asus is currently very large now. Conclusion: + Viewing angles thanks to IPS + Rotate, tilt, height adjustable - 3D gimmick - Brightness distribution bad - Display of focus - 3D perspective small - Housing reflects (piano lacquer) etc. So I'll stay only once with my old Asus with TN and still needs a bit more looking, too bad.
