From a processing perspective, are both pretty neat, the Panasonic acts valent, because the plastic front has no degree as partially at Philips.
The CD drive is clearly audible in both, but not too loud.
A buzz of power supplies was not heard.
The remote control of the Panasonic seems a bit cluttered because my Philips likes better because they just make do with fewer buttons.
Radio reception of Philips with wire antenna was very disappointing. It was a 'basic sums' - in all channels - mixed with noise is present. After connecting an amplifier antenna only low noise could be heard.
The Panasonic rustled wire antenna as well, but with correct orientation of the antenna of the receiver is fairly noise-free. When the amplifier antenna Panasonic brought nothing! ??
In both but applies: switching to mono brought good noise-free reception, with the Panasonic the mono setting to the individual transmitters is mitabgespeichert. So you can listen to some stations in stereo and others in mono. When Phillips will not do so either all in stereo or all would have to be heard in mono.
When playing MP3 failed for me the Philips completely in Anzeide the ID Tacks. The Philips showed only when pressing the display button on the title name. In the album navigation there were only numbers. Anyone can do mp3 players better.
The Panasonic, however, a number of the folder name (in Album navigation) or the title (this then passes through) quickly followed by display. They also noted on the USB flash drive, the position to which you have previously stopped.
The included loud speaker I have not tested the Panasonic produced a fuller, richer sound even on my large boxes. Also beneficial in Pana, the setting of bass and treble, with Philips is now preset sound patterns.
The Philips that I had was not satisfactory.
The Panasonic is much closer to my idea of a small complex in this price range, even if the radio reception a little better is expected.
