Compared with the S4-Cover absolute botch

Compared with the S4-Cover absolute botch

Samsung Galaxy S5 S-View Cover - Black (Accessories)

Customer Review

First of all: I am a big fan of the original accessories. I buy, if possible, even something like car charger fits for mobile phone brand, and bags / cases anyway. Which reminds me, the price is relatively unimportant.

Now to the S5 S-view Cover: The S-view Cover of the predecessor S4 was a cool part. It replaces the original rear back by identical looking back, and because of Flipteil is attached for the front. In principle, it was therefore an original back cover, as it is already standard goes into the device, plus "flanged" flip.

Now one would think actually that does not deteriorate much about this concept (actually much better not). But far from it - you can (Samsung). The cover for the S5 is namely no longer from this combination of original back cover plus flip, rather it is more like the well-known "Book Style" -Covern. Since the S5 in contrast to the two predecessors finally reused a back with a sensible feel, you, the device takes up very happy in his hand, and it is there also very good. The S-view Cover for the S5 would therefore ideally should be as the previous one original S5 Back Cover plus flip same. Instead, it is a synthetic leather part that does not work nearly as well in the hand as the original back cover. Furthermore, it is beyond the edges of the device, which will probably improve the edge protection. Unfortunately, it looks not only stupid, the device is thus additionally poor in hand because you just touched this relatively sharp edges of the cover.

The statement of Product Description "Replace the battery cover in look and feel" is in my opinion quite misleading. If you know the S4-Cover, you will be close from this formulation probably that this cover back looks exactly like the original back cover - as it was just too at S4. But this is just not like that. Although the cover also replaced the battery cover - but also an unfortunate by the much poorer appearance and feel that it brings.

Through this cover therefore is one of the biggest improvements in the S5 compared to the S4, namely the much better look and feel of the back, made completely destroyed. The smooth leatherette covers this feels similar to cheap (just different) as the backs of the two previous Galaxys.

As if that were not enough, comes as a further disadvantage of this design, adding that the cover when it was open, not directly closes properly again. In the previous cover could not happen because Flipteil and BackCover failed here, a continuous part, but of two different parts. Is it possible to somehow hard to describe, but who knows the previous cover, know what I mean. Here, however, absorbs the front part when closing always first again a bit upwards. By the time "puts" it then, but great is something else.

As a fan of the S4 S-View covers this one is for me really the ultimate crap. This part goes back. If the Koreans, who has designed, an honorable man would, he would move to a monastery and remain silent for the rest of his life ...

Related Reviews


Flip Cover not comparable with the original qualityitronikĀ® Flip Cover Protective display cover for Samsung Galaxy SIV S4 I9195 Mini Black (Wireless Phone Accessory) Tested and compared with the original battery.Samsung Li-ion Battery 1030 mAh for L100 / 110/200/210 / 310W, WB500, IT100, PL50 / 60/65, ES55 (Accessories) Compared with the predecessor TX-NR 626Onkyo TX-NR636 7.2 B-Channel Network Receiver (HDMI 2.0, WiFi, Bluetooth, 4k / 60Hz, HDCP 2.2, HiRes-Audio, Music Services, Remote app) (Electronics) Best Case in combination with the Smart-CoverBelkin Snap Shield Cover for Apple iPad Air smoke (Accessories) Compared with the new Logitech G502 mouseSharkoon Shark Force Gaming Mouse White (Personal Computers) Not suitable for brush use, not to be compared with the higher-quality product for 60 eurosW7 In the Buff Eye Colour Palette, 1er Pack (1 x 132 g) (Health and Beauty) Compared with the competition very low6x screen protector Olympus PEN Mini E-PM2 - Screen Protector foil ultra-transparent, invisible (Electronics) Samsung Galaxy S5 - does not work with the original cover with the built-in chip.QUMOX wireless charging pad QI charger black for Nexus 4 Nokia Lumia 920 Galaxy S3 S4 Note 2 3 (Electronics) Compared with the (more expensive) Pronomic CM-22 for me no audible differences!Professional condenser microphone Full Set Gold-head STUDIO Mic Broadcasting + Shock Mount for podcast webcast # 015 Compared with the Oly 9-18mmPanasonic DMW-GWC1GU Wide Converter for H-PS14042 and H-H014 22 mm (electronic) Compared with the SAL1870 the Sigma 17-70 is disappointingSigma 17-70mm 2.8-4.5 DC Macro Lens for Minolta / Sony (electronics) Not to compare with the "correct" Harry Palmer ...Harry Palmer - Men of the Apocalypse (DVD) Compared with an iPad very good! Even turning on and off with the Memopad cover works like the iPad!Asus ME103K-1B008A 25.65 cm (10.1 inches) Tablet PC (Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 1.5GHz, 1GB RAM, 16GB HDD, Adreno 320, Android Touchscreen) white (Personal Computers) A review which will allow us to compare with the S4Samsung Galaxy S5 smartphone (5-inch display, 16GB of memory, Android 5) charcoal-black (Wireless Phone) Super Easy; Compared with the Siemens Active ironing boardLeifheit 76080 ironing board AirActive M White (Kitchen) Not comparable with the previous modelBenning Duspol expert voltage and continuity tester, 050 262 (tool) The all-round talent - compared with the previousLG BP620 3D Blu-ray player (Smart TV, DLNA, Wi-Fi, HDMI, 1080p upscaler, USB) Black (Personal Computers) Good but with drawbacks (Zx5 compared with the Zx1)Kodak Playsport Zx5 Full HD camcorder (5.1 cm (2 inch) display, SD / SDHC card slot, 5x digital zoom, HDMI, up to 3m waterproof) green (Electronics)