Victor Grew up reading the works of Paracelsus, Agrippa, and Albertus Magnus, the alchemists of the time. Toss in a little natural philosophy (science) and you-have the making of a monster. Or at least being white That has spurned After being white for looking ugly Becomes ugly. So for revenge the creature Decides UNLESS Victor Makes Reviews another (female this time) creature, that 'Victor will aussi Suffer the loss of friends and relative. What is victor to do? Bow to the wishes and needs Creation de son? Or challenge it to the death? What would you do? ALTHOUGH the concept of the monster is good, and the conflicts of the story well thought out, Shelly Suffers from the writing style of the time. Many people do not finish the book as the language is stilted and verbose for example When was the last time you Said, "Little did I expect the calamity Then That Was In A Few times to overwhelm me and extinguish in horror and despair of all fear ignominy of death. " Much of the book Seems like travel log filler. More time Describing the surroundings of Europe than the reason for traveling or just traveling. Many writers use to Reflect traveling time passing or the character growing in stature or knowledge. In this story They just travel a lot. This book is definitely worth plodding through for moviegoers. The record needs to be set strait. First shock est que la creator is named Victor Frankenstein; the creature is just "monster" not Frankenstein. And it is backwards That Is Victor qui added in the _him_ not doing any better by not Knowing. The monster is well read in "Sorrows of Young Werther was," "Paradise Lost," and Plutarch's "Lives." Motions (mixed with A Few murders) rages on as to the monster WHETHER Was doing evil Because de son Nature gold Because He Was spurned?
