Since I have no time to online games, I can say anything about.
The single-player field, as with all competitors of MoH also a little short ... also ends the negatives.
- It has been chosen a realistic setting: various Special Forces vs. Taliban. I found personally interesting
- The different types of units come across well. Deep Ops team with special orders as well as the Ranger with the 'rough trowel'
- The setting is limited to Afghanistan. But very varied
- The numerous commands and radio messages I like for the mood
- The weapons match the units, even if you have less motivation than Batman has time to try something new, because your own equipment is usually more modern than the Taliban stuff
- Very well the times 1.2km firefights differ from urban combat situations at close range and in my view realistic battles on 50-300m or with the sniper rifle
- In general, the weapons feel more realistic after breakdown than Batman or BF2. An MG is a MG and has more power than an assault rifle and with the MP's is again weaker
- Shame: usually is the environment not to damage
- Super: the possibilities of movement: extremely comprehensive than in BF2 and by the "out of the fire cover" more realistic than in CoD. Yet not so unwieldy as often in Tom Clancy games
- The AI is so incredibly worse than CoD I do not find. Generally, I think they are stronger than BF2, what I think of the 3 Series to date for the weakest ... but is a matter of taste!
Overall, a good single player game, which compared to the last CoD and Battlefield parts too bad gets away!