At least for form part of this book is in the same vein: with paperbacks, the pages are well ventilated good high price and margin of well ensured editor. .
Regarding style, also played in the same category: lauteure wanted to write his story as a play by presenting the various actors in the introduction - but very real characters here hidden under pseudonyms that do not dépareilleraient in a comedy - and quotes extensively or Edmond Rostand Beaumarchais. Unfortunately, the imperatives certainly a very short time to keep the flavor of the reported events have clearly not allowed the company to go through. The story even sil reads easily, is of no particular literary taste but again, this is not what one expects of a such a book.
Once these few integrated fault, I was pleasantly surprised despite my initial reluctance. By revisiting the five year term of Sarkozy via the Hauts de Seine, Marie-Celie Guillaume has a sharp eye and uncompromising on cases sy place, this department is in many key respects in the past five years that sest (neuilléenne origin Sarkozy, weight of La Défense in French economy, preponderance of lump in the Hauts de Seine)
While we may regret this story a very Manichean aspect there is one side of the "nice" or at least those who have nothing to reproach himself and Marie-Celie lArménien "Baroness" Guillaume den and then they face the aggressors: the monarch, his son, the Thenardier and all their courtiers. In this distribution of roles, sometimes confused by the rest lauteure complacency on his camp lArménien is a charming man, full of culture and a rare person in politics. Marie-Celie Guillaume itself does not hesitate to throw some roses on the edge of caricature: Drafting woman, knowing emphasize looking good, fine psychologist of the human condition and strategist nourished by art principles of War Sun Tzu (duly instilled by his mysterious Asian master of a straight escaped Shaolin monastery).
This complacency is all the more surprising that I found lauteure very lucid on the size and especially the mediocrity of the political function and look what door on the hopes and disappointments raised by five years in power of Sarkozy.
Or even sil does not comes to weight illuminating eg Thenardier in a better light (which seems to me very difficult), I found lauteure well cowardly to ridicule lArménien acting itself in professional pure politics, and it lauteure -even a lesser extent. Dun hand it laments like many senior absence of consideration in the interest of general politicking fighting our elected officials, and not the other it nhésite one second to throw himself body and well in the political reconquest conducted by lArménien, delegating and its function for several months to his second. Id like to be able to do this at my work, while continuing to touch my salary
A sinterroger also on why this book: the Monarch who requested his head, is it really the will to denounce a harmful and too violent fight that lont led to publish this story? They Nont motivations not been a little more complex? discussed how particular receives compensation in morocco without quon know the end of the story word: ny there has not been a disappointment here that explains at least part of the break and this book?
Despite these reservations, it is worth repeating that this book of essays well above good number of this type. Marie-Celie Guillaume has personality to spare. The narrative is nervous and situations descriptions are sharp and relevant: they enough to convince the sincerity of the story and that lauteure deserves to be known and not be limited to the buzz. Even the exchanges to which it has not assisted do not fall into loutrancier. It shows the reader a poor consideration that one can have of our leaders, or at least those who hold the top of the poster. Mismanagement of public funds, arrogance and sense dimpunité, cultural vulgarity and mediocrity, media subservience to something with the complicity of courtiers journalists napprend is nothing new, we just regret to see how true this is. Marie-Celie Guillaume is right to emphasize the contradiction of our country by taxing the monarchy regicide: Ridiculous as the film, one has the feeling of living the last years of the reign of Louis XVI with a Fifth Republic breathless as létait dil the monarchy are two centuries. A very sad conclusion
