For camera itself says everything. I just want to comment briefly on whether the X-Pro1 is an alternative to XE-2, because I have both. The differences are really small. The autofocus - speed is - contrary to some reports - absolutely identical (with the latest firmware). Identical bad so to speak). This disturbs but only if the Sohnemann handball or daughter playing hockey. For everything else, it is enough thick! even for great shots in football reached it easy with a little practice. In the viewfinder of the X-Pro1 I could do without in most cases ... really suck it I'm only with the XF 35 - lens that I use rarely. Mostly I have the 18-55 off and this extends to me already to make it far in the optics into still fun. From 50-230 times to mention. Also the relevant image section is then easy to still make too small sense ... even if it's nice to be able to observe the surroundings of the image live. Why do I still sell the XE-2 again? the X-Pro1 has just more Spirit, looks cool out, goes better with my big hands, feels something valent and is absolutely gorgeous. On many days, I only take pictures in order to take this wonderful piece of technology in the hands can. The XE-2 is simply too similar to me to keep them. And offers little advantage ... of the somewhat smaller size apart (so you it emphasis). As well as the improved EVF does not help (I notice the difference hardly). And that has the XE-2 Wireless LAN? who cares ... newfangled stuff that distracts from the actual.