How is this "event" would have been decisive for the rest of the world? This world would it have been better or worse?
And what would become of this young Austrian penniless but hopeful?
The purpose is simple, but prose, she is not ... She's beautiful, slender, artistic, lively ...
The finding, it is not simplistic but reflected, argued and enriched by serious research.
EE Schmitt pushes our thinking as much as our emotions in their most absurd retrenchments ... He manages to make Adolf H. passionately endearing and disagreeably human Hitler.
The construction that the author chooses is quite simple but ambitious: to tell in turn the lives of these two men are one ... and EE Schmitt uses his talent for juggling from one universe to the without losing his drive way. He uses a clever trick: it changes according to his writing speaks of Hitler we know or that we would have liked to meet; his style changes with the historical and personal situations encountered by the two parts of the "other".
Not content to give us a philosophical reflection on history, war, politics and the course of Hitler, Schmitt sometimes launches into an intelligent discourse on art and the artist.
I never took the initiative to read a biography of Hitler. What attracted me was the artistic hand that Schmitt wanted to explore, she pushed me to learn more about the anti-Semitic dictator. What encouraged me to read this book is really "from the other."
Made hungry for information about Hitler, seeking to understand what led him to where we know, moved to tears or bursts by Adolf H., I launched myself entirely in the book.
The rational and the emotional are confronted me every time I basculais the unbearable reality to fiction amazing imagined by Schmitt.
The two stories are so intense that closes the book with difficulty. Indeed, despite the horrors caused by Hitler, it is difficult to detach from Aldolf H and characters that he could meet ....