To make it short, the TTK 50 S is indeed a proven system, but has the same problems with the rising humidity in the device as 40E. Only by the lack of indication of the measured humidity by the device, falls this design flaw to only the least.
He expressed to the effect that the device starts after reaching the set humidity value in the room about every 15 minutes again for 1 minute. It is also difficult to find the right setting for the humidistat. An Example:
In a particular setting the humidity is reduced until the room until the unit shuts down at 55% humidity.
Would normally be expected that the humidity slowly rises in the space (by residual moisture in the articles or by inflowing moist air) again until the device switches on, for example, at 65% humidity again and the humidity is reduced again to the pre-set 55%.
The device but flawed measures, a different picture emerges:
Shutdown for example at 55%.
Although the room humidity is not increased appreciably, partly is still at 55%, the unit jumps after 15 minutes by the rising humidity inside the unit again. Only until the moist air is removed from the device, usually about 1 minute.
In my bathroom this always leads to further continued dehumidification that after 6 hours, the humidity of the set 55% is reduced to 50%.
Since this is niederiger than the desired humidity, the one setting the device turns instinctively bit high. After showering the consequence that the device but then completed his dehumidification even at a high humidity of 65% for example. So runterstellen again.
I am aware that this is a problem, with the need to fight all manufacturers that attach the humidity sensor in the device. For this reason, I have now bought an external humidistat which takes over the control of the device.
Otherwise, the TTK 50 S is significantly quieter than the TTK 40 E. The dehumidification performance is within the specified range.
Current draw measured: 240Watt in operation, 1.5 watts at idle.
