First, I found the first fifty pages unexciting because I found the action a little too slow to implement, as soon as we know the meal before the son of the narrator has committed or -Michel- suffered a serious act then after we wait, we wait ... And when we finally know what happened then all the narrative takes its scale and it becomes exciting because it is politically incorrect and very biting and very true; the narrator and his wife go to a fancy restaurant to eat with his brother -personnage known, future prime minister, egotistic and vain, weak and unbearably and his wife We will track everything "dinner" up to and during final tip each course of action will evolve And the "problem" of the son will be resolved and we will learn about the narrator, his wife, his brother and his family biographical data that will shed light on the tensions and antagonisms short I ... let myself amazed small excerpt on the adopted son of Burkina Faso by the brother of the narrator, the narrator who speaks "- You're just a racist, threw me Claire (brother's wife) when I was entrusted my aversion to Beau -.! No way I answered him I would if I was a racist hypocrite nice just because of the color of his skin and its origins This would Affirmative racist if I would... I concluded that the hypocrisy of our nephew by adoption comes from Africa in general and Burkina Faso in particular. - It was a joke, "said Claire."!