What I personally like pretty good on the scripts in this series that you do not let the events just run only straight, but all sorts of change of perspective and time jumps to get involved. This makes of course that you have to be in the matter with more concentration to keep track. This applied but worth it. Also is dispensed back to a higher-level narrator, guiding the concentration instead entirely on the dialogues. Here an even stronger focus this time on Freud's heart, so its confrontation with the id and super-ego.
The pace of the story is a very quiet. Only once will flash briefly on something like a threat. This moment flies but as soon as he came back. After the first suspicion is once open to light, it is no longer particularly difficult to understand the facts, unfortunately. This pushes the voltage level of the radio play of course already a long way far and without the subtleties in the narrative structure would probably not feel long entertained as well.
Musically one goes very similar way as in the episodes previously. The pieces are the tone of the narrative adequately overall quite cautious with a few clear, then gladly louder accents in appropriate places. The resulting atmosphere blends puzzle piece wonderful for the whole.
I would like to take this opportunity not to lose too many words, as I have already done in the reviews of the previous episodes on the recurring main spokesman. Perhaps only so much that due to its objective through the script Freud with his inner interlocutors, especially Nicolas Artajo, even stronger stand than superego in the center, while Anna and Gruber are not quite as active.
A strong focus is at least as focused on the interviews with the prosecutor's office, where one holds with Lutz Mackensy, Mario haters and Ingo Albrecht also high-profile voices willing to be only further complemented by people such as Marie Bierstedt.
Whether one has responded to the rather loud criticism of the guest commentary by Dr. Salwa Meier or whether it intended from the beginning, not always to be just the same people have their say, can not be assessed from here. One thing you can say quite clearly: Dr. Tilmann Hoppe like it better than its predecessor as a commentator with a complementary analysis on the subject lot. So we must keep the love.
Conclusion: Again a very atmospheric staging an interesting idea, which is, however, not too difficult to understand and so a little lost.