In the product description now is entirely true "The naming of the trademarks for the spare parts business is done on the basis of § 23 Trademark Act (Markengesetz) and not call the manufacturer of the goods offered." This is an important statement, because the article therefore fits perfectly into the machine because it is reworked into details of the original. Only the plastic can be seen much easier. It is an extreme plagiarism without question. The provider identifies the now reasonably understandable by the above formulation. Maybe I open the battery case one day and keep the content in addition to the original ... in the hope that this is also similar.