I can praise the graphics of BF3. The player is guided through lovingly crafted scenes. The Frostbite 2 Engine does the rest and added that soldiers in the staging of a credible Battlefields.
But that's about the only thing in the latest counterpart of Battlefield series stands out positively.
I think everyone is such a game buys almost exclusively due to the multiplayer. That's where the shooter fails over its entire length. The map design is such insensitive that the game just is not fun. It can be seen no front. Everyone pulls somehow by his own thing. Either you're lucky and is not eliminated from the rear or one dies of a camper who has holed up with mines and sausages in any house.
The spawn points are totally failed in all game modes. Often there is a risk directly at the enemies to spawn.
Pointless tanks are placed on melee City maps available. Individual weapons and vehicles are part grossly overpowered (Petscheneg, G36C, Amtrac to name a few examples), what perhaps can be a subjective impression.
So not subjectively the many hackers who manage a K / D Ratio of 6, X master
EA `s matter. Finally already is Battlefield 4 in the pipeline.
A star is available for the graphics and one for the really good co-op mode.