Good approaches that are implemented unfortunately mies in detail

This game is created by the approach and the potential ago awesome:
- Very many possibilities and details, which can also be delegated to assistants but.
- Visually beautiful 3D mode.
- Various interesting game modes.
- Realistic data on clubs and players.

Unfortunately, the implementation is often so bad in the details that you have to wonder if was ever tested here or whether the game can be at all been described as completed:
- First, my personal pet peeve: I'm actually really great 3D mode
players and referees behave sometimes so absurd that this game a real nerve factor after a few hours: Players stand next to the ball and wait for 5 seconds until an enemy started coming etc ,; Advantage rule = disaster (you'd think that would be exactly falschrum programmed); yellow cards = pure arbitrariness; sometimes there kick although no opponent even close was. Furthermore, I have the impression that very often post or crossbar hit. Somehow it seems to me also so that it makes a huge difference for the Ergenis whether you can be the whole game or just the kicks Show ...
- Crashes: Join me since the patch but rarely on. (These are now again other errors from previous versions in it - as IT'ler you have to wonder whether the development team using a version control system at all or whether there simply prevails just total chaos.)
- Many logical errors and inconsistencies in the game / process (I have no desire to mention here, but at the latest after a few hours of play, you can enumerate at least a dozen).
- Partial unrealistic increases in player skill.
- How many teams always have astronomical budgets for player purchases, remains a mystery.

Conclusion: The game is full of mistakes and still not actually completed. This robs one progresses increasingly playing time to play ball. - A product in this state is to bring out for nearly EUR 50,00 an impertinence.

PS: I still hope that another patch fixes at least the worst mistakes. (Hope dies last!)