Good, but nothing new 1

By reading this book, I felt a big sense of déjà vu.
Not surprising given that the book of the principle is exactly the same as JL Bourne: Armaggedon of the chronicles.
I preferred the original.
The hero is projected in a zombie world, starting from home, the whole story in a newspaper, did exactly that in the first (and best), JL Bourne.

JL Bourne military, lives in the United States, Loureiro is a lawyer, lives in Spain (Galicia), that's the starting point.
So, when zombies in a book by a French pastry chef, a Swiss banker, or an Italian pizzaiolo?

The newspaper of the principle has, in addition, a very large limits, especially for the suspense, it is written in the past, by a living person if it necessarily writing.
It had bothered me for chronic Armaggedon, it became downright painful here.

The beginning of the book, where he remains imprisoned at home is particularly long and soft.
The narrative of the beginning of the pandemic is not involved, what happens remains distant and blurred, suddenly no anxiety is missed for a zombie book.
For me, a fan of zombie movies and books, the beginning of the infection is one of the highlights (sometimes even worship), when done right, too bad.

Otherwise, the author puts much emphasis on sound and olfactory sides of the story.
To my taste a little too much to the detriment of the visual, allowing less to "see" the action, to project, but that's a personal feeling.

You understand what I think: even choose a log in the zombie world, so take that of JL Bourne.