The WK300 / Multiquick 3 cooks quite fast, with 2200 Watt it has exactly the same power as my previous kettle. The WK 500 model has 3000 watts and needs for 200ml instead of 45 seconds only 35 according to the datasheet. Practically cooked the WK300 as fast as my old boiler with 2200 Watts, however, I have stopped any time.
A benefit, the smaller WK300 have compared with the WK500. I really wanted this, he was unfortunately already sold out.
The WK300 does not draw as much power in the manual "only model WK 500" is mentioned in that not too many consumers should be turned on simultaneously. Securing the socket should be 16A. What exactly is threatening, is not described! What thing is for now in this ominous note?
In practice, this means to me "Grandma's Kitchen". A slightly older home with modern kitchen and many appliances including dishwasher in use. It ranges in addition on the radio and at the same time makes it BUMM and securing rausfliegt and all equipment and the lights are out. Remember, it may be that the WK300 avoids such a thing, the WK 500 seems a prime candidate for anger-prone kitchens to be, because nothing else is intended to indicate this notice.
A disadvantage of the WK300 is in my opinion the lid. This has a beak that otherwise there is always something in the cleaning and in the way. Here I have my old cooker was all just like better, here is a really pretty design won a little about the functionality. I lack a clear acoustic signal at the end of heating, as it has already strongly emphasized another tester.
But all in all I'm thrilled, especially the equipment of high quality seems to be processed very clean and high quality. I hope he does not just look like this! Chic he is all. With such a kettle can live.
