Good router but really too expensive for the service

Good router but really too expensive for the service

Netgear Router R7500-100PES Nigthhawk WiFi AC2350 (Accessory)

Customer Review

After trying a D-LINK AC750 (very average), a TP-LINK archer C5 (great product but worn limited), I tried the Netgear R7500. High quality product, somewhat simplistic interface, even in advanced mode, and above all, I was expecting to pick up a signal on the 5GHz band "good" show "very good" and on the 2.4Ghz band "very good" view "excellent".

Test Environment:
Freebox and the Netgear router is installed on a high shelf in a closet at the entrance, where happens the adsl. The test machine is on the 1st floor 7m straight. By cons separated by a concrete slab about 25 cm, the floor of the first floor.

IT environment:
Equipment:
- An HP N54 server with Ubuntu-server connected to 1Gb wired to the router Netgear R7500
- A machine with Mac OS X and Windows 7 (Test performed on both SE story that the drivers for the wireless card "BCM4352" are not in causes)
On the software side, I used iperf server on Ubuntu and Mac OS X client on "10.8.5" and Windows 7

Unfortunately, it did nothing. Besides, I left the wifi Freebox V3 (2.4Ghz N) issue, just to compare. Well Freebox emits between 5 and 10 dB higher, signal received at -55 dBm for the router from -60 to -65 dBm. Yet the Freebox has no external antenna. For the 5GHz band, I have nothing comparable.

The first test showed a flow rate of 2 to 5 MB / s (16 to 45Mbps) over the band of 5GHz. Signal received at -70 dBm. On the 2.4Ghz band flow is mounted between 9 and 10MB / s (72 to 80Mbps).

The second test with the router upstairs to about 7m from view test machine showed a rate of 40MB / s so about 320Mbps in 5GHz band (see photo). What is decent but far from theoretical performance. The received signal was about -45dBm in 5GHz band (see photo) and -35dBm 2.4Ghz band. There, the result is quite satisfactory, but the router is almost next to me (;-)))

I also tried with an iMac (next to the test machine). 2008 iMac accepting (already (;-)) in the 5GHz 802.11n 300Mbps. The result is very good in relation to the capacity of the wireless card.

Now, when the signal received from the router drops "above" about -50dBm, the bandwidth drops quickly enough and above is not necessarily very stable.

That said, I have pretty much the same damage with other routers. The ceiling is perhaps one of the reasons ... Or router performance are those announced or is it clamped to transmit power and as soon as there is an obstacle the signal drops quickly ... it's may be true for all wireless routers out today ???

That said, I repeat, with the Freebox, I capped at 9MB / s therefore 72Mbps 2.4Ghz band, I was entitled to expect better throughput when reading the OEM specifications hopefully a real gain above compared to a freebox a different age ...

Product returned.

Note: A big thank you to Amazon.com to purchase their flexibility and return.

Multilader Rank: 4/5
October 28
Kushiel the cycle Rank: 5/5
January 20
OK 14 January 1367 Rank: 3/5
October 13
Perfect for a gift 5 Rank: 5/5
December 25
Widely ok Rank: 4/5
July 30

Related Reviews


Very good equipment - but really too expensiveSamsung Galaxy Note N5100 8.0 Tablet WiFi + 3G (20.32 cm (8 inch) display, 16 GB of internal memory, Android 4.1 OS, 2GB of RAM, WLAN n standard, S-Pen) white (Personal Computers) Good workmanship, but unfortunately too big for the MacBook 13 "RetinaCool Bananas (9042364) Shockproof Pouch for Apple MacBook Pro 33cm (13 ") (Black / Green) (Accessory) too expensive for the serviceCoffeeduck New Generation Permanent Filter Holder for Senseo Café (Cuisine) Delivery is fast true angel sweet but too expensive for the sizeEngelsfigur ON HANDS WITH HEART 10 CM NEW In my view, a bit too expensive for the qualityTO75 Bee Size M - XXL Costume Bee Costume Carnival Costumes Carnival (Toys) Too expensive for the material usedadidas Men's Clothing Short Sleeve Shirt Tiro 13 (Sports Apparel) 20 euros too expensive for the cheap plastic.Star Wars TPF26024 - Advent "Clone Wars" (Toys) a very good camera, and expensive, but not too expensive for what is offered!Sony NEX-7KB system camera (24 megapixels, 7.5 cm (3 inch) display, Full HD Video) Kit incl. 18-55mm Lens (Electronics) Cheap and really look nice but really too inadequate to the cameraCahaya camera bags PU Leather Case for Sony DSC-RX100 Camera Black (Accessory) A bit too expensive for the qualityCooler® New Men Women Vintage Canvas Backpack Retro Vintage Backpack for Outdoor Sports Backpack Uni Rucksack University Good equipment, just a little expensive for this serviceGastroback 42429 Design Kettle Advanced Pro (household goods) Good, but too expensive for the officeCanon PGI-5BK Original Black Ink Cartridge (Office Supplies) good lighting films, but too expensive for the small amount!Wagalum luminescent films for the stroller (Baby Product) Just too expensive for the rather poor quality - functional but good.RUCO V 411 splash for Mixer transparent (household goods) Obviously too expensive for the proposed content, but fun to play if you have it on hand.Metal Gear Solid V: Ground Zeroes (Video Game) Very good fair-weather lens, perhaps a bit too expensive for the specificationNikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm 1: 3.5-5.6G ED VR lens (67mm filter thread, image stabilized) incl HB-39 hood (Camera). Convenient but too expensive for the quality.Marto Wall holder f.histor. Swords (Sports Apparel) Good, but a bit expensive for the qualityPhilips - 929001115203 - Hue - Tap - Connected switch Mobile- and Connected Products Compatible with Philips Hue (Kitchen) good very effective product but a little expensive for the qualityThe Original Tangle Teezer Brush Hair Mandarin Sweetie (Health and Beauty)