Impartial journalism?

In these times of political and media lynching of Dieudonné, it would be such a shame not to howl with the wolves in the secret hope of selling whole pallets of books. Under cover of investigation happily mélant complotiste theory, dextrême right activists, Holocaust deniers, old dextrême left militants, obsessed by the anti-Israel struggle Salafi Islamists and youth suburbs, Frédéric Haziza presents his vision of the double portrait of Dieudonné, lessayiste Alain Soral and the leader of the Revolutionary Nationalist Youth Group, Serge Ayoub said Batskin.

Soral is seen as extreme rightist taxed while the latter is already forbidden in a preceding book ("it magace BE stowed extreme right, adjective that means for me the neoconservatives, the US-Zionist imperialist power and banking international ", interview with Naulleau). History of further raising the sensationalist sauce, Haziza (journalist's impartiality and independence at all beyond suspicion ...) mell to his wedding show for everyone, "destabilization attempt of the state" towards French general , Syria and so on and more eccentric.

While the journalist CPAC also tells insults and threats he suffered from that he refused to meet Alain Soral on his show in November 2012, but is that a reason ppour lay that kind of sloppy book, demonstration rather hazardous and qualify the legitimate resistance of many citizens face the well pensance instituted "" brown red "nebula"?

Obviously, common sense would especially in these times of widespread crisis "journalists" focuses instead on the denunciation of the real everyday problems of our compatriots only fuel rather sterile self-destructive polemics and personal revenge, but of real reporters, he still exist?

CREW.KOOS