Intentional deception or just usual sham?

In the "small print" of the policy can be found that my equipment is insured only up to a rapid decline of its value - which is despite repeated examination not to notice when the product presentation on the Amazon sales page. Rather, there the impression that their extended warranty which is what the word means - namely either fix up again or equivalent equipment in case of damage.

In the insightful before buying FAQs slight age-dependent power reduction is given to 80% (extract):
Warranty Extension
1st year = 100% of the purchase price
2nd year = 80% of the purchase price
3rd year = 80% of the purchase price
4th year = 60% of the purchase price
5th year = 40% of the purchase price

With the 3-year warranty extension I buy my loud treaty but the years 3-5 and not 1-3 years extension.
Shame. The product is called it: "Extended Warranty" ??
So there's only one year coverage to 80%, a 60% and the last to only 40% of the purchase price - so stehts in the small print. Not a word, not a tick it at the product presentation - quite simply, at least a sham.
The information in the FAQs is simply wrong - see above: there are "extension-year" listed, but then in the contract the age of the equipment.

Since the term "guarantee" is relevant is that such drastic reduction or change of power in the accessible via a link small print is probably now ausjudiziert (see subscription traps) is not permitted.

Sad and disappointing that Amazon such a procedure tolerates. Or even involved: "Amazon has concluded in favor of interested customers an insurance contract with ERGO Direkt Insurance ..."