The author compares two systems of thought, the first "reason" by association, and the second is good at thinking. The subject is interesting but academic. I would have liked more personal exercises and much less "I". Each chapter begins with "Amos and I" that really annoyed me and I was very disappointed with his approach on intuition, it binds to the experience. Only good surprise, the theory last 2 chapters on welfare that comes from the idea that we have of his life and not his life he called DRM for reconstruction method of the day. In short, much ado about not much ... A Nobel Prize for that?
