The Australian Professor Bob Carter is in his book: a very serious and faclich clean on the reasons why the interpretations of the IPCC should be regarded as covered "Climate The Counter Consensus". Carter does so at a very detailed level, for beginners in the subject probably slightly too detailed and long-winded, for professionals full of interesting aspects. Despite the care and attention shown in scientific reasoning, but I was missing in the book a little balance. The focus of the book is over-heavy on the side of "criticism of the IPCC". There are indisputable also a whole range of climatic aspects that both "skeptics" and "alarmists" are seen similarly. Where these coincidences are, one hardly finds in this book unfortunately. It enteht the incorrect impression that everything the IPCC does is wrong.
