The jeans were totally crumpled in a plastic bag. I was wondering already. Crinkel optics? You can read it anywhere in the product description. But if you look closely at the image, you can see it.
Color default looks the jeans the product image similar. Mine is not darker or lighter. The fabric is very soft and comfortable. By 2% elastane fabric is stetchig. But only slightly.
The workmanship is very good. And the jeans does not stink to chemistry.
Zun section and fit.
The cut is good. A low rise jeans that can not pinch at the belly. The pants are actually normal straight cut, only the leg is below very closely.
For size:
Which makes me think. I've compared it with my Soccx Jeans Shally W30 / L32. The Tom Tailor Jeans falls above a size bigger (size 31) and in the length of 2cm shorter (length 30). Another jeans in size 38 is suitable the same except for leg length again. Here 3cm missing. So I would the Tom Tailor Jeans revolutionize the way on the product image, I would flood.
Here are some dimensions for the undecided:
Waist 44cm
Pants inseam 75cm
97cm total length
Lower leg length 15 cm
No zipper
4 buttons
Reserve Button No
possible belt width up to 4cm
The pants were measured in the unstretched state. Through stretch and crinkle some values change.
I like the jeans just fine, also of the fit. It has in it a beautiful figure. But the leg length is too short for me.
